One of the many reasons I don’t post on this blog as frequently as I used to is because of Facebook. Using that resource, I’m able to post notes and photos and general life comments to my friends and family quickly and easily.
That said, since the shootings in Arizona on January 8, 2011, there has been a meme floating around on Facebook that upsets me greatly. It states:
To everyone who is calling for stricter gun laws in light of the tragedy in Tucson, may I offer this little tidbit: If guns kill people, then pencils misspell words, cars drive drunk, and spoons made Oprah fat ! Remember: Hold the person accountable for their actions, not the means they chose to utilize!!! (reposted)
Why does this upset me so much? Because it’s illogical and faulty in its attempted analogies.
So you think you know what that meme was saying? Think again.
Pencils can spell words correctly and communicate with people; cars can get people where they need to be and even get help to where it’s needed; spoons can feed the starving. What can a gun do, other than put a hole into something? It’s not even a good tool for that. They serve one purpose and that is to kill someone (or an animal).
We have laws to keep cars (and the people in and around them) safe. We have laws to keep food (and the people eating them) safe. We even have laws on that pencil to prevent libel (to keep the reputations of those written about safe). So why is it so unreasonable to at least make guns less dangerous?
For me, the (420 character) meme should be:
To those calling for no gun laws, I offer an important observation: Guns kill people, yet we live in a world w/ few laws on them. We have laws protecting us from words people write w/ pencils, from cars we & others drive, from food we eat (& utensils we eat w/), & more. Hold people accountable for their actions, including taking away their rights when they prove themselves incapable of using them responsibly. Repost.
If you were to outlaw pencils in order to prevent misspelled words, people would still be free to write with pens. If you were to outlaw cars in order to prevent drunk driving, people would still be free to drive trucks. If you were to outlaw spoons in order to prevent obesity, people would still be free to use forks. We are wanting to outlaw SEMI-AUTOMATIC weapons and the right to purchase any/all firearms by those with criminal records, and this would prevent mass murdering rampages, since these are the only tools for that job. It wouldn’t be possible to hit 18+ people in seconds with a revolver.
Currently brandishing a firearm is LEGAL in Arizona. I’ve even had one pointed at my house (my bedroom window in Tucson, specifically) and was told by the police that the person(s) doing this did nothing illegal. This is ridiculous. We should be able to agree on some basic standards of gun safety. This is not about taking guns away from everyone. Can’t we agree to some common sense protections? Rather than arming everyone in order to protect ourselves from the “bad guys”, doesn’t it make sense to at least make some minimal effort to keep the guns away from the “bad guys” from the start? And to limit the damage that can be done by these guns?
Some would respond that we would only be hindering the law abiding citizens, not the criminals who would continue to get their guns through other means. I would remind those people that the shooter in Tucson legally purchased his firearm. The Virginia Tech shooter also purchased his gun legally. So did the Fort Hood shooter. Yes, determined criminals will probably still find weapons, but shouldn’t we at least make it a little difficult for them? Shouldn’t we reduce their available options? Shouldn’t we try to reduce the overall supply of these weapons of mass murder?
To make blithe comparisons between semi-automatic handguns and pencils is to trivialize the issue and disrespect the memory of those who were wounded and killed in Tucson.
By: Lisa
Related Articles:
Share/Save